Legal Opinion

People v. Sprinkle

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 29, 1976No. 75-385PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. PRESIDING JUSTICE ALLOY

delivered the opinion of the court:

Defendant Billy Rose Sprinkle appeals from a denial by the Circuit Court of Will County of a post-conviction petition. The denial of the petition was made without a hearing.

Sprinkle and his codefendant, James Perruquet, originally pleaded guilty to charges of murder and deviate sexual assault arising out of an incident in which the victim was a 14-year-old boy who was attacked by both defendants at a time when Sprinkle and Perruquet were also 14, after school. Both defendants were sentenced to concurrent penitentiary terms of 75 to…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. People v. GilmoreIllinois Supreme Court · 1976
  3. The PEOPLE v. RoseIllinois Supreme Court · 1969
  4. People v. SprinkleIllinois Supreme Court · 1974
  5. The PEOPLE v. WareIllinois Supreme Court · 1968

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. CarltonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980
  2. People v. WeathersAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980
  3. People v. CastroAppellate Court of Illinois · 1987
  4. People v. MartinAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980
  5. People v. HobsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API