Legal Opinion

Richman v. Home Insurance Co. of New York

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 20, 1953No. Appeal, No. 215PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Dithrich, J.,

In this action in assumpsit based upon a water damage insurance policy, a jury returned a verdict in favor of defendant-insurer. This appeal is from the order of the court below overruling plaintiffs motions for judgment n.o.v. and a new trial.

The policy in question insured “against all DIRECT LOSS AND DAMAGE caused solely by the accidental discharge, leakage or overflow of WATER . . . from within the following source or sources: . . . [inter alia] RAIN or SNOW ADMITTED DIRECTLY to the INTERIOR of the BUILDING through DEFECTIVE ROOFS, LEADERS or SPOUTING, or by OPEN or…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. San Gabriel Valley Country Club v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Armon v. Aetna Casualty and Surety Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  3. Fenmode, Inc. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Thompson v. New Haven Water Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1913
  5. McCullough v. HartpenceNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1948

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. PaulsonWyoming Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Gold v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2012
  3. Al Berman, Inc. v. The Aetna Casualty & Surety CoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1954
  4. Robert Hawthorne, Inc. v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1957
  5. T.H.E. Insurance v. Charles Boyer Children's TrustDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2006

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API