Richman v. Home Insurance Co. of New York
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Dithrich, J.,
In this action in assumpsit based upon a water damage insurance policy, a jury returned a verdict in favor of defendant-insurer. This appeal is from the order of the court below overruling plaintiffs motions for judgment n.o.v. and a new trial.
The policy in question insured “against all DIRECT LOSS AND DAMAGE caused solely by the accidental discharge, leakage or overflow of WATER . . . from within the following source or sources: . . . [inter alia] RAIN or SNOW ADMITTED DIRECTLY to the INTERIOR of the BUILDING through DEFECTIVE ROOFS, LEADERS or SPOUTING, or by OPEN or…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- San Gabriel Valley Country Club v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Armon v. Aetna Casualty and Surety Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
- Fenmode, Inc. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1942
- Thompson v. New Haven Water Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1913
- McCullough v. HartpenceNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1948
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. PaulsonWyoming Supreme Court · 1988
- Gold v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2012
- Al Berman, Inc. v. The Aetna Casualty & Surety CoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1954
- Robert Hawthorne, Inc. v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1957
- T.H.E. Insurance v. Charles Boyer Children's TrustDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2006
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.