Legal Opinion

Bringhurst v. O'Donnell

Court of Chancery of Delaware

Decided May 14, 1924PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The Chancellor.

First. As to that branch of the case which concerns the ancient lights, there can be no doubt concerning what the answer ought to be at the present stage of the litigation. In Clawson v. Primrose, 4 Del. Ch. 643, Chancellor Bates, in an opinion which reveals those qualities of studious learning, lucidity of reason and clearness of expression for which he is so justly famed, held that the doctrine of ancient lights as he understood it to prevail at common law prior to our separation from England was transplanted to these shores, and this being so was, by virtue of the provisions…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Clawson v. PrimroseCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1873
  2. Haitsch v. DuffyCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1914
  3. Hulley v. Security Trust & Safe Deposit Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1885

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Cameron v. USAA Property & Casualty InsuranceDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1999
  2. Fenmode, Inc. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1942
  3. State Ex Rel. Buckson v. Pennsylvania RailroadSuperior Court of Delaware · 1967
  4. Edgell v. DivverCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1979
  5. McCullough v. HartpenceNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1948

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API