Legal Opinion
People v. Hardy
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided September 17, 2014No. 2012-00726PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Appeals by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from four sentences of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Griffin, J.), all imposed December 15, 2011, on the ground that the sentences were excessive.
Ordered that the sentences are affirmed.
The defendant’s valid waiver of his right to appeal precludes review of his contention that the sentences imposed were excessive (see People v Bradshaw, 18 NY3d 257, 264-267 [2011]; People v Ramos, 7 NY3d 737, 738 [2006]; People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 255 [2006]; People v Hidalgo, 91 NY2d 733, 735 [1998]; People v Alexander, 104 AD3d 862 [2013]).
Eng, RJ.,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- People v. LopezNew York Court of Appeals · 2006
- People v. HidalgoNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
- People v. BradshawNew York Court of Appeals · 2011
- People v. RamosNew York Court of Appeals · 2006
- People v. AlexanderAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
3Cited by13 opinions
- People v. RocchinoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- People v. McRaeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- People v. Romero-FloresAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- People v. StilesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- People v. SpitzerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.