Legal Opinion

People v. Alexander

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 20, 2013PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Griffin, J.), imposed January 20, 2011, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

The defendant’s valid waiver of his right to appeal precludes review of his contention that the sentence imposed was excessive (see People v Bradshaw, 18 NY3d 257, 264-267 [2011]; People v Ramos, 7 NY3d 737, 738 [2006]; People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 255 [2006]; People v Hidalgo, 91 NY2d 733, 735 [1998]; People v Foy, 89 AD3d 1103, 1103 [2011]; People v Pertillar, 37 AD3d…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. LopezNew York Court of Appeals · 2006
  2. People v. HidalgoNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
  3. People v. BradshawNew York Court of Appeals · 2011
  4. People v. RamosNew York Court of Appeals · 2006
  5. People v. FoyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. People v. RocchinoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
  2. People v. McRaeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  3. People v. HardyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  4. People v. Romero-FloresAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
  5. People v. StilesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API