Legal Opinion
Idea Research and Development Corp. v. Hultman
Supreme Court of Iowa
Decided November 17, 1964No. 51464PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPetebson, J.
This declaratory-judgment action was instituted by plaintiff against Central Broadcasting Company and Evan Hultman, Attorney General, to:
1. Determine the validity of plaintiff’s contract with the broadcasting station.
2. Enjoin WHO-TY from breach of contract with plaintiff.
3. Enjoin the Attorney General from his threatened action against the station.
The trial court dismissed the petition, and granted an injunction against WHO-TY and the Attorney General. Plaintiff appealed.
Plaintiff is what is known as a television packager and is the owner of a program known as “TY Bingo”. In the conduct of…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- State v. JonesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1940
- Glover v. MalloskaMichigan Supreme Court · 1927
- State v. DanzWashington Supreme Court · 1926
- Commonwealth v. WallMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
- Maughs v. PorterSupreme Court of Virginia · 1931
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Mobil Oil Corp. v. Attorney GeneralMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1972
- Greater Loretta Imp. Ass'n v. State Ex Rel. BooneSupreme Court of Florida · 1970
- Idea Research and Development Corp. v. HultmanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1964
- Mobil Oil Corp. v. Attorney GeneralMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1972
- Planned Parenthood of the Heartland, Inc., Emma Goldman Clinic, and Jill Meadows v. Kim Reynolds, ex rel. State of Iowa, and Iowa Board of MedicineSupreme Court of Iowa · 2023