Willis v. Mullins
District Court, E.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER RE: SUMMARY ADJUDICATION AND RECONSIDERATION
ANTHONY W. ISHII, Chief Judge.
Defendants have made three motions for summary adjudication. Plaintiff has made a motion for reconsideration. All motions deal with related matters. The motion for reconsideration is denied and the motions for summary adjudication are granted in part and denied in part.
I. History
Gary Willis (“Plaintiff’) was a registered occupant of the E-Z 8 Motel in Bakersfield, CA on March 27, 1996. Police received reports of heavy traffic from that room and were informed it was registered under Plaintiffs name. The Defendants…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- James Mills v. City of CovinaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- Cordova v. City of AlbuquerqueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
- Cordova v. City of AlbuquerqueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
- Apothio, LLC v. Kern CountyDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025