Marston v. Dresen
Wisconsin Supreme Court
APPEAL from the Circuit Court for La Orosse County. Action to set aside certain conveyances and transfers of property by a debtor to his wife. The allegations of the complaint will sufficiently appear from the opinion. The defendants demurred generally to the whole complaint, and to each separate cause of action stated therein, and appealed from an order overruling the demurrer.
1Opinion of the CourtCole, C. J.
We do not see any valid objection to the complaint in this action. As we understand it, it is in the nature of a creditor’s suiPunder the old practice, and is *419expressly authorized by sec. 3029, R. S. It appears from the complaint that the plaintiffs recovered a judgment against the defendant Dresen and one Fjelstad, his partner, in November, 1888, for $910.81, and that an execution has been issued upon the judgment which .has been returned wholly unsatisfied. It is alleged that the debt for which the judgment was obtained was contracted solely on the credit of Hubert Dresen, as the other.…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Ahlhauser v. DoudWisconsin Supreme Court · 1889
3Cited by4 opinions
- Baker v. BakerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1935
- Daskam v. NeffWisconsin Supreme Court · 1891
- Faber v. MatzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1893
- Lehr v. MurphyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1908