Legal Opinion
Penn Advertising Of Baltimore, Inc. v. Mayor And City Council Of Baltimore
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided November 13, 1996No. 94-2141PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
101 F.3d 332
24 Media L. Rep. 2503
PENN ADVERTISING OF BALTIMORE, INCORPORATED, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF BALTIMORE, A Municipal
Corporation; Kurt L. Schmoke, in his official capacity as
Mayor of Baltimore City; David Tanner, in his official
capacity as the General Superintendent of Zoning
Administration and Enforcement of Baltimore City,
Defendants-Appellees.
The American Advertising Federation; The American
Association of Advertising Agencies; The Association of
National Advertisers, Incorporated; The Outdoor Advertising
Association of America, Incorporated; Washington Legal
Founda…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited5 opinions
- 44 Liquormart, Inc. v. Rhode IslandSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Anheuser-Busch, Inc. v. SchmokeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1995
- Penn Advertising Of Baltimore, Inc. v. Mayor And City Council Of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1995
- Anheuser-Busch, Inc. v. SchmokeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1996
- Penn Advertising of Baltimore, Inc. v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1996
3Cited by5 opinions
- Philip Morris Inc. v. HarshbargerCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
- Greater New York Metropolitan Food Council, Inc. v. GiulianiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- Federation of Advertising Industry Representatives, Inc. v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
- Lindsey v. Tacoma-Pierce County Health DepartmentDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1997
- (2008), Maryland Attorney General Reports2008