Legal Opinion
Lindsey v. Tacoma-Pierce County Health Department
District Court, W.D. Washington
Decided November 6, 1997No. C97-5076 RJBPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT; DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
BRYAN, District Judge.
This matter comes before the court on Defendants’ First Motions for Partial Summary Judgment (Dkt.#34), and Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment on Federal Preemption, State Preemption and Agency’s Exceeding the Scope of its Delegated Authority (Dkt.# 36). The court has considered the pleadings filed in support of and in opposition to the motions and the file herein.
SUMMARY JUDGMENT STANDARD
The moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law when the…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Lindsey v. Tacoma-Pierce County Health DepartmentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Lindsey v. Tacoma-Pierce County Health DepartmentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Pervez v. BacerraDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020