Reutzel v. STATE, DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Peterson, Justice.
The issue for decision, important to the administration of the license suspension provisions of the Safety Responsibility Act, is whether as a matter of either constitutional imperative or statutory intent, the commissioner of public safety must afford an accident-involved, uninsured motorist a hearing, with notice, prior to the commissioner’s determination of the amount of security necessary to satisfy any judgment that might thereafter be entered against the motorist.
The Safety Responsibility Act (L. 1945, c. 285, codified as Minn. St. c. 170), as disclosed in its title,…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Joint Anti-Fascist Refugee Committee v. McGrathSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Sniadach v. Family Finance Corp. of Bay ViewSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Wisconsin v. ConstantineauSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Ex Parte PoreskySupreme Court of the United States · 1933
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- D.B. v. D.G.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2013