Legal Opinion

State v. Bailey

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 30, 2021No. 122597PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 122,597 STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. BRIAN C. BAILEY, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT A litigant waives or abandons an issue by not supporting an argument with pertinent authority or explaining why the argument is sound despite a lack of pertinent authority. Appeal from Johnson District Court; JAMES CHARLES DROEGE, judge. Opinion filed July 30, 2021. Affirmed. Brittany E. Lagemann, of Olathe, was on the brief for appellant. Shawn E. Minihan, assistant district attorney, Stephen M. Howe, district attorney, and Derek Schmidt, attorney general,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Nelson v. ColoradoSupreme Court of the United States · 2017
  2. State v. TagueSupreme Court of Kansas · 2013
  3. State v. DavissonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2016
  4. State v. BaileySupreme Court of Kansas · 1990
  5. United States v. BecknerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. CollierSupreme Court of Kansas · 2022
  2. State v. GallowaySupreme Court of Kansas · 2022
  3. State v. HueySupreme Court of Kansas · 2022
  4. State v. McNealSupreme Court of Kansas · 2025
  5. State v. MulleneauxSupreme Court of Kansas · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API