Legal Opinion

Meulners v. Hawkes

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 29, 1974No. 44210PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Todd, Justice.

This action was brought on behalf of Sharon L. Meulners, a minor, (hereafter plaintiff) for injuries received when struck by a car driven by defendant, Daniel B. Hawkes, as she was standing alongside a parked vehicle on a public street. Her father, Clyde Meulners, sought consequential damages. The jury returned a verdict apportioning negligence of the parties and in addition found that plaintiff had assumed the risk. The trial court in response to plaintiff’s post-trial motion withdrew the issue of assumption of risk from the case and entered judgment for plaintiff. Defendant…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Springrose v. WillmoreSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
  2. Schrader v. KrieselSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
  3. Coenen v. Buckman Building CorporationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
  4. Beery v. Northern States Power Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1953

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Kuehner v. GreenSupreme Court of Florida · 1983
  2. Evanson v. JerowskiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  3. Lametti v. Peter Lametti Construction Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
  4. Lenoble v. City of Fort LauderdaleDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
  5. Milloch v. GettySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API