Legal Opinion

McCracken v. Montezuma Water & Land Co.

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided October 14, 1913No. 3685PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Denver County Court. Hon. George W. Dunn, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtHurlbut, J.

October 2, 1909, appellee, as plaintiff, filed its complaint in the county court of the City and County of Denver, to recover from defendant (appellant) a judgment in the sum of $933.32 with interest, for balance alleged to be due for and on account of water delivered to defendant for irrigation purposes during the years 1903, 1904, 1905 and 1906 respectively.

The complaint contains four causes of action, claiming in each the sum of $333.33 for water delivered and services rendered in delivering the same for the year, *282alleging such sum' to be the reasonable value thereof ’; ¿dmitting, however,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Sellar v. ClellandSupreme Court of Colorado · 1875
  2. Cartwright v. RuffinSupreme Court of Colorado · 1908
  3. Miller v. ThorpeColorado Court of Appeals · 1894
  4. Northern Colorado Irrigation Co. v. PouppirtColorado Court of Appeals · 1912
  5. Lewis v. JeromeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1908

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Rogers v. LetfordSupreme Court of Colorado · 1938
  2. Hough v. LucasSupreme Court of Colorado · 1924
  3. Montezuma Water & Land Co. v. McCrackenSupreme Court of Colorado · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API