Montezuma Water & Land Co. v. McCracken
Supreme Court of Colorado
Error to Denver Cownty Court. Hon. W. C. Hood, Jr., Judge.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Scott
The plaintiff in error was the, owner of an irrigation canal in the county of Montezuma, in this state, and of certain water rights, and was carrying in said canal waters for public use for irrigation. In April, 1895, upon the application of certain water users from the said canal, the Board of County Commissioners of Montezuma county undertook to and did, fix what the board held to be reasonable maximum rates for water to be delivered through the said canal to the water users therefrom, and among which was the defendant in error.
The rate was fixed at ninety dollars per cubic foot per second…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Wheeler v. Northern Colorado Irrigation Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1887
- Chicago, B. & Q. R. v. DeyU.S. Circuit Court for the Southern District of Iowa · 1889
- McCracken v. Montezuma Water & Land Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1913
- Board of County Commissioners v. Montezuma Water & Land Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1907
3Cited by2 opinions
- Matthews v. Tri-County Water Conservancy DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1980
- Northern Colorado Irrigation Co. v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1934