Hananiya v. City of Memphis
District Court, W.D. Tennessee
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT
DONALD, District Judge.
Before the Court is Defendant City of Memphis’ motion for partial summary judgment. Plaintiff Yolanda Michelle Hananiya (“Hananiya”) asserts claims for sex discrimination and hostile work envi-ronmenf/sexual harassment, pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e. In support of the motion for partial summary judgment, Defendant argues that 1) Plaintiff failed to timely file her Charge of Discrimination with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Zipes v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.