Legal Opinion
Waterman v. Batton
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided December 11, 2003No. CIV. CCB-02-1725PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
BLAKE, District Judge.
The defendants, Michael Batton, Christopher Heisey, Kenneth Keel, and the state of Maryland, have moved for summary judgment against the plaintiffs, Michael Waterman, Roland Waterman, and Ruth Waterman. The issues in this motion have been fully briefed and no hearing is necessary. Local Rule 105.6. For the reasons stated below, the motion for summary judgment will be denied.
BACKGROUND
On the afternoon of Tuesday, November 28, 2000, three police officers employed by the Maryland Transportation Authority (“MdTA”) fired nine rounds of ammunition at an automobile…
2Cases cited76 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Waterman v. BattonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2005
- Johnson v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2012
- Johnson v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2012
- Brady v. Walmart IncDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2024
- Waterman v. BattonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2005
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.