Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Perrin

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided April 19, 2011No. A10-1352PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RANDALL, Judge*

Appellant commissioner of the Minnesota Department of Human Services argues that the district court erred when it (1) disallowed and denied Hennepin County’s (the county) original claim for recovery of medical-assistance benefits based on its claim that the district court erroneously interpreted the supreme court’s holding in In re Estate of Barg; and (2) concluded that the county’s alternative claim for recovery was barred by the doctrine of collateral estoppel. We conclude that the district court properly disallowed and denied the county’s original claim based on Barg.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hubred v. Control Data Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  2. In Re the Estate of BargSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
  3. Illig v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  4. Gollner v. CramSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
  5. A&H VENDING CO. v. Commissioner of RevenueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: K. E. L. and J. L. W., Parents.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API