Legal Opinion
Bud Antle, Inc. v. Barbosa
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 9, 1994No. Nos. 93-15002, 93-15642 and 93-15652PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
REINHARDT, Circuit Judge:
This ease involves several complicated questions regarding the preemptive effect of the National Labor Relations Act (“NLRA” or “the Act”). Bud Antle, Inc., (“Bud” or “the company”) appeals the district court’s Rule 12(b)(6) dismissal of its action against the members and executive secretary of the California Agricultural Labor Relations Board (“ALRB” or “state board”).1 The company claims that the National Labor Relations Act ousts the ALRB of jurisdiction to adjudicate various unfair labor practice charges which are now pending before the state board. It seeks…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- San Diego Building Trades Council v. GarmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Chaulk Services, Inc. v. Massachusetts Commission Against DiscriminationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
- Bud Antle, Inc. v. BarbosaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Casiano-Montañez v. State Insurance Fund Corp.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2012
- Fort Belknap Indian Community v. MazurekCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Oscar Smith v. National Steel & Shipbuilding CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.