Dingman v. Duluth, South Shore & Atlantic Railway Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Chippewa; Steere, J. Case by Walter Dingman against the Duluth, South Shore & Atlantic Railway Company, for the unlawful discrimination against plaintiff’s business. A judgment sustaining a demurrer to plaintiff’s declaration is reviewed by plaintiff on writ of error.
1Opinion of the CourtBrooke, J.
Plaintiff, a resident of Sault Ste. Marie, in this State, commenced suit against defendant by declaration, alleging: That he had been engaged for several years in the business of carrying passengers and their baggage for hire, being the owner and operating a number of buses and wagons used for that purpose, and principally in carrying passengers and baggage to and from the passenger trains of railroads having their termini in the city of Sault Ste. Marie; that defendant is a common carrier, engaged in the business of carrying passengers and freight between various points in the State of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Barney v. Oyster Bay & Huntington Steamboat Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1876
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. West Coast Naval Stores Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Kalamazoo Hack & Bus Co. v. SootsmaMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
- Kates v. Atlanta Baggage & Cab Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1899
- Donovan v. Pennsylvania Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1903
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Black & White Taxicab & Transfer Co. v. Brown & Yellow Taxicab & Transfer Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad v. Town of MorristownSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Thompson Towing & Wrecking Ass'n v. McGregorCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1913
- State Ex Rel. Burr v. Jacksonville Terminal Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1925
- Newberry v. Central of Georgia Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1921
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.