Legal Opinion
Kalamazoo Hack & Bus Co. v. Sootsma
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided December 24, 1890PublishedCited by 29 opinions
Error to Kalamazoo. (Buck, J.) Trespass. Plaintiff brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtMorse, J.
The Kalamazoo & Hastings Construction Company, a limited copartnership, operating the Chicago, Kalamazoo & Saginaw Eailway, being in the actual occupancy of a piece of land used by it as depot grounds in the city of Kalamazoo, leased to the plaintiff, also a limited copartnership, operating a hack and bus line in said city, a certain portion of said premises, described in the lease as—
“That piece of ground lying and being between the sidewalk on the .east side of Walbridge street and the side track of the Chicago, Kalamazoo & Saginaw Eailway, in said city, being 70 feet in length from the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Old Colony Railroad v. TrippMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888
- New England Express Co. v. Maine Central RailroadSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1869
- Camblos v. Philadelphia & R. R.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania · 1873
3Cited by29 opinions
- Black & White Taxicab & Transfer Co. v. Brown & Yellow Taxicab & Transfer Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Pennsylvania Co. v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1899
- Exton v. Central RailroadSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1898
- Association of Independent Taxi Operators, Inc. v. Yellow Cab Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1951
- Kates v. Atlanta Baggage & Cab Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1899
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.