Legal Opinion

Shook ex rel. Estate of Shook v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided March 8, 1926No. D-333PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, Chief Justice

The plaintiff’s intestate was a seaman on the ill-fated U. S. S. Conestoga, which sailed on March 25, 1921, from San Francisco for Pearl Harbor, Territory of Hawaii, en route to Samoa. From that date nothing has been heard of the vessel. Alleging that under the authority of the statute, section 287, Revised Statutes, the Secretary of the Navy fixed the date of the loss of the vessel as of June 30, 1921, and that the Comptroller General on February 7, 1924, decided that the members of the crew of the Gonesfoga should be allowed pay to April 30, 1921, and made settlement accordingly with…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. McLean v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. Medbury v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  3. D. M. Ferry & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1898
  4. McLean v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1910
  5. Foster v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1897

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Former Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1928
  2. Hord v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1929
  3. Revenue Oil Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API