Legal Opinion

Revenue Oil Co. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided July 5, 1932No. M-351Published

1Opinion of the CourtBooth, Chief Justice

Defendant demurs to plaintiff’s petition, relying upon two assignments therefor. First, that the allegations of the peti*693tion do not state a canse of action witbin tbe jurisdiction of the court, and second, that the facts alleged do not constitute a cause of action against the defendant.

Eight separate suits have been brought in this court by ■eight individual plaintiffs, claiming and designated as original locators.” Another suit is instituted by these same individuals jointly, and this case brought in the name •of the Revenue Oil Company, a corporation, makes ten separate proceedings…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Farmers' & Mechanics' National Bank v. DearingSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  2. Oklahoma v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  3. D. R. Wilder Manufacturing Co. v. Corn Products Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
  4. Oates v. National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  5. Tennessee Coal, Iron & Railroad v. GeorgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1914

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API