Legal Opinion

Hord v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided May 6, 1929No. H-100Published

1Opinion of the CourtGraham, Judge

Under what theory the plaintiff concluded that this court had jurisdiction in this case does not clearly appear. It will be necessary to recite some of the facts.

In a county in the State of Texas one Jimmie Stovall and J. A. Pust were discovered in possession of an automobile, a search of which developed that it contained a large quantity of distilled spirits, and they were arrested and the spirits seized. The search was made by deputy marshals, and the warrant under which they were held recites a violation of both the national prohibition act and the tariff act.. *587It appears that they were…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. One Ford Coupe AutomobileSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. D. R. Wilder Manufacturing Co. v. Corn Products Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
  3. United States v. BabcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  4. Cheatham v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  5. Snyder v. MarksSupreme Court of the United States · 1883

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API