Legal Opinion

Livingston v. Chesapeake & O. Ry. Co.

District Court, N.D. Oklahoma

Decided April 12, 1937No. 2396PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRANKLIN E. KENNAMER, District Judge.

The plaintiff seeks to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained as a result of defendant’s negligence. None of its tracks run through or into the State of Oklahoma. For the purpose of soliciting freight and passenger traffic, defendant employed an agent and rented an office at Tulsa, Okl. The business of this agent was to procure passengers and freight to be transported over defendant’s lines. If a passenger desired a ticket and applied for one, the agent took the applicant’s money and procured from some railroad running into…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. International Harvester Co. of America v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  2. Green v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
  3. Davis v. Farmers Co-Operative Equity Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
  4. Shambe v. Delaware Hudson R. R. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  5. Thurman v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Perkins v. Louisville & N. R. Co.District Court, S.D. California · 1951
  2. Hinchcliffe Motors, Inc. v. Willys-Overland Motors, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API