Legal Opinion
LogoPaint A/S v. 3D Sport Signs SI
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided February 18, 2016No. CIVIL ACTION NO. 15-04865PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
Pappert, District Judge.
Plaintiff LogoPaint A/S (“LogoPaint”) sued Defendants 3D Sport Signs SI (“3D Sport”), Carsten Jensen Charmig (“Char-mig”), Xavier Palmerola Fernandez (“Fernandez”), Jose Isabal Roca (“Roca”) and Traffic Sports USA, Inc. (“Traffic Sports”) (collectively “Defendants”), alleging patent infringement under 35 U.S.C. § 271. Defendants move to transfer venue to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a). For the reasons that follow, Defendants’ motion is granted.
I
In April 2015, LogoPaint submitted a bid to…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Piper Aircraft Co. v. ReynoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Van Dusen v. BarrackSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- George Jumara and Evangelina Jumara, H/w v. State Farm Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- Continental Grain Co. v. Barge FBL-585Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Van Cauwenberghe v. BiardSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Dariz v. Republic Airline Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2019
- Vermont Juvenile Furniture Manufacturing, Inc. v. Factory Direct Wholesale, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2016
- MELBOURN v. WAL-MART STORES, INC.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2020