Legal Opinion

Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Marhenke

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 24, 1941No. 9634Published

1Opinion of the Court

121 F.2d 598 (1941)

SEARS, ROEBUCK & CO.

v.

MARHENKE.

No. 9634.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

June 24, 1941.

Rehearing Denied July 29, 1941.

Hoge, Pelton & Gunther and A. Dal Thomson, all of San Francisco, Cal., for appellant.

George K. Ford, Simpson Finnell, Jr., Russell T. Ainsworth, and Fletcher A. Cutler, all of San Francisco, Cal., for appellee.

Before WILBUR, MATHEWS, and HEALY, Circuit Judges.

WILBUR, Circuit Judge.

This is an action for damages for personal injuries, tried before the court without a jury. Findings and judgment were for the plaintiff in the sum of $5,000. Defendant…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Stoner v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. Klein v. Duchess Sandwich Co., Ltd.California Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. MarhenkeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1941
  5. Tourte v. Horton Manufacturing Co.California Court of Appeal · 1930

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API