Legal Opinion

Oniji v. Studebaker Corp.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 31, 1917No. Docket No. 45PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Certiorari to Industrial Accident Board. John Oniji presented his claim for compensation against the Studebaker Corporation for injuries received in defendant’s employ. From an order awarding compensation, defendant brings certiorari.

1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.

This proceeding is brought here to review a decision of the industrial accident board affirming an award of the committee of arbitration granting claimant as compensation the sum of $9.85 a week for a period of 30 weeks. There is no question that the Studebaker Corporation was in the month of December, 1915, engaged in business in Detroit and was subject to the provisions of Act No. 10, Extra Session 1912 (2 Comp. Laws 1915, § 5423 et seq.). Oh or about the 14th day of said month the claimant, while in the employ of said corporation and working in its heating room, met with an accident…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Rayner v. Sligh Furniture Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Bayne v. Riverside Storage & Cartage Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Poniatowski v. Stickley Bros.Michigan Supreme Court · 1916

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Mailman's CaseSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1919
  2. Passini v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1918
  3. McMinn v. C. Kern Brewing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Singleton v. Hope Engineering Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1931
  5. Rowe v. Leonard Warehouses, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1919

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API