Edgcomb Steel of New England, Inc. v. Salvo & Armstrong Steel Co.
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the Court
The plaintiff in this action seeks to recover for goods which it sold and delivered to the defendant. The defendant answered with a general denial, and additionally' questioned the plaintiff’s corporate existence and its qualification to do business in Massachusetts. Mass. R. Civ. P. 9 (a), 365 Mass. 751 (1974). A judge of the Superior Court, sitting without a jury, found that the plaintiff was “a validly organized New Hampshire corporation doing business in Massachusetts in accordance with law, [that it had] provided materials to the Defendant by agreement and that the Defendant owes the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Dillingham v. SnowMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1809
- Norman M. Morris Corporation v. Hyman Weinstein, D/B/A Bright Star EnterpriseCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
- Bond v. MullinsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1860
- Salvato v. DiSILVA TRANSPORTATION CO. INC.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1952
- Remington Arms Co. Inc. v. Lechmere Tire & Sales Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1959
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Logan Equipment Corp. v. Karen Construction Co.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1985
- Monseco Leather, Inc. v. GFC Corp.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1993
- Professional Carpet System v. Capitol Partners Management Co.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1994