Legal Opinion

Bond v. Mullins

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided December 26, 1860PublishedCited by 29 opinions

CASE 19 — APPEAL PROM ANDERSON CIR0ÜIT COURT. cited Stanton's Rev. Stat., page 288, sections 10, 11 ; lb., section 3, page 285; Ib.,page 294, section 40. cited 1 Bibb, 292 ; 3 lb., 78 ; 2 J. J. Mar., Williams vs. Jackson; Payne, Spc. vs. Clemments, MS.opin., Sept., 1854; 2 Rev. Slat., chap. 84, secs. 10, 11, 12.

1Opinion of the Court

JUDGE DUVALL

delivered tiie opinion of tee court :

The county court of Anderson county, on the application of Mullins, made an order appointing viewers “to view the Bairdstown road, and the places where it is proposed to erect two gates across the same, viz : One at Thos. Kavanaugh’s woodland pasture, and the other between said Mullins’ and Mrs. Hackley’s, and report the conveniences and inconveniences which will result as well to individuals as to the public from the erection of said gates.”

At the next term the viewers reported, that “after having viewed the place's proposed to be gated by M.…

2Cited by29 opinions

  1. Monument National Bank v. Globe WorksMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
  2. Merchants' National Bank v. Citizens' Gas Light Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1893
  3. Commissioner of Banks v. Cosmopolitan Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925
  4. Hawes v. Anglo-Saxon Petroleum Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
  5. Braintree Water Supply Co. v. Inhabitants of BraintreeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API