Suravitz v. Pristasz
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Middle District of Pennsylvania; ■ Charles B. Witmer, District Judge. Action by Katie Pristasz against Jacob Suravitz. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
J. B. McPHERSON, Circuit Judge.
The plaintiff in error has clearly disregarded our rules, and we might well dismiss the writ for this reason, without considering any other question. But in view of the size of the verdict (which seems to be unusually large, if all the circumstances of the case are taken into account) we have decided to pass upon the assignments of error as a matter of grace.
[1] The asserted lack of jurisdiction does not require discussion. The plaintiff is, and was declared in the pleadings to be, “an alien and a subject of the kingdom of Austria,” and the defendant is, and was…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Parsons v. Bedford, Breedlove, & RobesonSupreme Court of the United States · 1830
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. BehymerSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Arkansas Valley Land & Cattle Co. v. MannSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Wabash Railway Co. v. McDanielsSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Railroad Co. v. FraloffSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Vidal v. South American Securities Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1921
- Ford Motor Co. v. Hotel Woodward Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1921
- TIMES NEWS. LTD.(GR. BRIT.) v. McDonnell Douglas Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 1974
- Raytheon Mfg. Co. v. Radio Corporation of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1935
- Pringle v. StorrowDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1925
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.