Troudt v. Oracle Corp.
District Court, D. Colorado
1Opinion of the Court
Robert E. Blackburn, United States District Judge
The matter before me is defendants' Motion To Exclude Proposed Expert Testimony of Michael Geist [# 127],1 filed March 23, 2018. I grant the motion in part and deny it in part.
I. JURISDICTION
I have jurisdiction over this case under 28 U.S.C. § 1331 (federal question) and 29 U.S.C. § 1132(e)(1) (action to enforce rights under ERISA).
II. STANDARD OF REVIEW
The instant motion implicates Rule 702 of the Federal Rules of Evidence, which governs the admissibility of expert witness testimony. The rule provides, relevantly, that
[i]f scientific,…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- General Electric Co. v. JoinerSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Bragdon v. AbbottSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- United States v. NacchioCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Estate of Chad Alexander Burnett v. City of Colorado SpringsDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2025
- Hauck v. Wabash National CorporationDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2021
- Moore v. Humana Inc.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2024
- Owners Insurance Company v. 11380 East Smith Road, LLCDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2021
- Ramos v. Banner HealthDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2019
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.