Legal Opinion
Morrison County Soil & Water Conservation District v. Armstrong
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided October 7, 1986No. C7-86-1000PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SEDGWICK, Judge.
The employer appeals by writ of certiora-ri from a determination by the Commissioner’s representative that the employee did not intentionally falsify his time sheets and should be awarded unemployment compensation benefits. We affirm.
FACTS
Respondent James Armstrong worked for the Morrison County Soil and Water Conservation District for 12 years before his discharge December 19, 1985 for submitting false information on two of his time sheets.
On October 10, 1985 instead of reporting to work, Armstrong performed custom machine work for a contractor. On his time sheet for…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Lumpkin v. North Central Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
- Nyberg v. R. N. Cardozo & Brother, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
- Chellson v. State Division of Employment & SecuritySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
- Winkler v. Park Refuse Service, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- Ruzynski v. Cub Foods, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Riley v. Transport Corp. of America, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990