Legal Opinion

Lovell-McConnell Mfg. Co. v. Automobile Supply Mfg. Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern New York

Decided November 20, 1911PublishedCited by 3 opinions

In Equity. Suit by the Eovell-McConnell Manufacturing Company,-the Hutchison Electric Horn Company, and Miller Reese Hutchison against the Automobile Supply -Manufacturing Company and Louis Rubes, president. On motion for preliminary injunction.

1Opinion of the Court

CHATFIELD, District Judge.

The complainants allege ownership of, and right to manufacture and sell under (through various partial *659and limited assignments by the patentee Miller Reese Hutchison), three patents. No. 923,048, May 25, 1909, No. 923,049, May 25, 1909, and No.^ 923,122, May 25, 1909.

[1] The defendants are charged with infringement. The present motion is for preliminary injunction, but has been complicated by other motions on the part of both defendants and complainants with respect to alleged unfair advertising and threatened litigation. The complainants now charge also unfair…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hall Signal Co. v. General Ry. Signal Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1907
  2. Marchand v. EmkenSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  3. Wright Co. v. Herring-Curtiss Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1910
  4. Wright Co. v. PaulhanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1910

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Winchester Repeating Arms Co. v. OlmstedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1913
  2. Lovell-McConnell Mfg. Co. v. Automobile Supply Mfg. Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1914
  3. Lovell-McConnell Mfg. Co. v. Waite Auto Supply Co.District Court, D. Rhode Island · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API