Legal Opinion

Wright Co. v. Paulhan

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided June 14, 1910No. 326PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York.

1Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.'

This is an appeal from an order granting preliminary injunction in a suit on the Wright patent which is sued upon in Wright Company v. Herring-Curtiss Company (filed to-day) 180 Fed. 110. At the outset of appellee’s brief it is stated that the essential question on which the controversy pivots is whether or not defendant in using the alleged infringing machines utilized the rear vertical rudder in conjunction with the ailerons or adjustable margins in maintaining lateral balance. '

In this case as in the other we have conflicting affidavits as to questions of fact, and for the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Wright Co. v. Herring-Curtiss Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1910

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lovell-McConnell Mfg. Co. v. Automobile Supply Mfg. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern New York · 1911
  2. Montgomery v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1928
  3. Crown Cork & Seal Co. v. Brooklyn Bottle Stopper Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern New York · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API