Legal Opinion
Nathan v. State
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided August 29, 2002No. 42, 61, Sept. Term, 2001PublishedCited by 53 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RAKER, Judge.
In this case, we again address the constitutional limitations on searches and seizures conducted during the course of a traffic stop. Petitioner Corinthious James Nathan and respondent Horace Shaw, Jr. were convicted of multiple drug possession and importation charges in the Circuit Court for Wicomico County, following the court’s denial of their motions to suppress evidence seized as the result of a traffic stop and search of the van that Nathan was driving and in which Shaw was a passenger.
The trial court denied the motions to suppress on the grounds that the scope of the…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- Longshore v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
- State v. RuckerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
- Bailey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
- Crosby v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2009
- State v. NievesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.