Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Gross v. Marshall

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 10, 1974No. 74-281PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPaul W. Brown, J.

The question before this court is whether a writ of prohibition is a proper procedure by which appellants may seek relief from appellee’s order of October 29, 1973. This court shares the opinion of the Court of Appeals that that extraordinary remedy is inappropriate in this case, and we therefore affirm its judgment.

The present controversy stems from an order of the Court of Common Pleas relating to the conduct of discovery proceedings by one of the parties in litigation before it. Such orders have been specifically held interlocutory, and thus not subject to immediate appellate review,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Klein v. Bendix-Westinghouse Automotive Air Brake Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1968
  2. State ex rel. Staton v. Common Pleas CourtOhio Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Kennedy v. ChalfinOhio Supreme Court · 1974

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Berger v. McMonagleOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Ruwe v. Board of Township TrusteesOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  3. State Ex Rel. Allstate Insurance v. GaulOhio Court of Appeals · 1999
  4. State ex rel. Dow Chemical Co. v. Court of Common PleasOhio Supreme Court · 1982
  5. State Ex Rel. Corn v. RussoOhio Court of Appeals · 1999

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API