Commonwealth v. Feagley

I join in the majority opinion. I would add to its excellent analysis briefly as follows.

Appellant contends that the conditions imposed on ARD are illegal and excessive. Assuming, arguendo, that his contentions have merit,* how may the conditions properly be challenged? Unless ARD is revoked, appellant’s charges will be held in abeyance until ARD is completed. Consequently, direct appeal of a final order would not be available as the challenged license suspension would have expired, the charges would be dismissed, and appellant’s claim *608would be moot. Thus, while ARD acceptance does not…