Strachan Shipping Company v. Tom Melvin and Ponce Cement Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1DissentJohn R. Brown, Circuit Judge
rpQ a literal void in the stat-ut6j the Court’s solution produces inequitable, if not shocking, results. None of these consequences could have been intended by a Court speaking, as does this one> in the high and noble terms of equitable principles linked with a liberal application of the Longshoremen’s Act in favor of the injured maritime worker as the some-time ward of the Admiralty, jn g0 deciding, the Court rejects contrary holdings of at least two other Circuits an(j applies our prior Voris decision to a situation not even remotely contemplated by that case. Moreover, this meth-0(j 0f…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Ryan Stevedoring Co. v. Pan-Atlantic Steamship Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Reed v. the YakaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Mitchell v. the EtnaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1943
- Chapman v. HoageSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Strachan Shipping Company v. Koninklyke Nederlandsche Stoomboot Maalschappy, N.V.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.