Legal Opinion

In Re Motion Picture "Standard Accessories" & "Pre-Vues" Antitrust Litigation

United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation

Decided March 20, 1972No. 93PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

2Per curiam

Plaintiffs in four treble damage antitrust actions pending in two separate districts move the Panel for transfer to a single district for pretrial proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407. Two plaintiffs, Poster Exchange and Exhibitors Poster Exchange, 1 are distributors of motion picture advertising accessories (referred to as “standard accessories”) to motion picture exhibitors. The third plaintiff, Houck Theatres, is a motion picture exhibitor.

Poster Exchange and Exhibitors Poster Exchange allege that the manufacturers of the standard accessories conspired to deprive them…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Exhibitors Poster Exchange, Inc. v. National Screen Service CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
  2. The Poster Exchange, Inc. v. National Screen Service CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
  3. In Re Multidistrict Private Civil Treble Damage Litigation Involving Plumbing FixturesUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1971

4Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re Glenn W. Turner Enterprises LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1973
  2. In Re Texas Gulf Sulphur Securities LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1972
  3. In Re 7-Eleven Franchise Antitrust LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1973
  4. In Re Air Crash Disaster at Toronto International Airport on July 5, 1970United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API