Legal Opinion
In Re 7-Eleven Franchise Antitrust Litigation
United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation
Decided April 25, 1973No. MDL No. 3109PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
2Per curiam
The Panel ordered the parties in this litigation to show cause why the above- captioned action should not be transferred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407 to the Northern District of California for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions previously transferred to that district and assigned to the Honorable Robert H Schnacke. Defendant favors transfer of the action to that district, while the Cohen plaintiffs oppose transfer. The parties waived their right to oral argument and we have concluded from the papers filed that the Cohen action must be…
3Cases cited2 opinions
- In Re Texas Gulf Sulphur Securities LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1972
- In Re Motion Picture "Standard Accessories" & "Pre-Vues" Antitrust LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1972
4Cited by3 opinions
- Ungar v. Dunkin' Donuts of America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
- Uber Technologies, Inc. v. United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2025
- David Ungar v. Dunkin' Donuts of America, Inc. And Quincy Adams Donuts, Inc. C/o C.T. Corporation, in No. 75--1625. John Rader, an Individual v. Dunkin' Donuts, Inc., a Delaware Corporation and Dunkin' Donuts of America, Inc., a Massachusetts Corporation, in No. 75--1626Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976