Legal Opinion

Juhan v. Cozart

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 7, 1991No. 9010SC435PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PHILLIPS, Judge.

Since the materials before the trial court establish without contradiction that defendants Cozart did not know that a sewer line was under the house they sold to plaintiff and her husband and that they made no oral representations to them about it, plaintiff’s fraud claim was properly dismissed and we affirm that part of the judgment.

But plaintiff’s claim for breach of warranty against encumbrances stands on a different and stronger footing. For neither the grantor’s ignorance of an encumbrance nor the grantee’s knowledge of it will bar the enforcement of a covenant against…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Abernathy v. . StoweSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1885
  2. Waters v. North Carolina Phosphate Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  3. Carter v. CONTINENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF NYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  4. Lockhart v. . ParkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  5. Gerdes v. ShewCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cty. of Moore v. AcresCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2022
  2. Cty. of Moore v. AcresCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API