Legal Opinion

Staten v. McMahan

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 6, 1959No. 37712PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WELCH, Justice.

This action was filed by Lucille Mc-Mahan, plaintiff, against D. J. Staten, for wages based upon an alleged oral contract of employment. The parties waived a jury and agreed that the court could try the case. Judgment was rendered for plaintiff, finding that there was an oral contract of employment, although there was never an amount agreed upon to be paid as wages; that plaintiff had worked at grocery stores for defendant for 220 hours; that a reasonable wage was 65 cents per hour, and that plaintiff should recover from defendant the sum of $143. It is from this judgment…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. St. Louis Trading Co. v. BarrSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  2. Dunn v. T. J. Cannon Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  3. Gassaway v. SkiveersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  4. Sosbee v. ClarkSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
  5. Oklahoma Natural Gas Co. v. PickettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Parkhill Truck Company v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
  2. Porter v. TayerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963
  3. Harrell v. HortonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
  4. Hyre v. PrattSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963
  5. Porter v. TayerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API