Lamm v. Crumpler
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.
This case, with the same parties and the same complaint, has been heretofore before this Court. Lamm v. Crumpler, 240 N.C. 35, 81 S.E. 2d 138. In that appeal in affirming a judgment overruling a demurrer, we said: “The defendants may answer, and issues be drawn upon the pleadings and the factual situation may be fully developed upon the trial in Superior Court. Then the court may consider the case in the light of the evidence offered. And such consideration will not be foreclosed by decision now made on the demurrer.”
This case is a sequel to the decision in Lamm v. Crumpler, 233 N.C. 717, 65…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- McMullen v. HoffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Armstrong v. TolerSupreme Court of the United States · 1826
- Vaszauskas v. VaszauskasSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
- Tator v. ValdenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1938
- Waggoner v. Western Carolina Publishing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Kessing v. National Mortgage CorporationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- Feldstein v. Nash Community Health Services, Inc.District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1999
- Harrison Agency, Inc. v. Pacific Mutual Life InsuranceDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 1989
- DRAPKIN v. MJALLIDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2020
- FAZ OF RTP, LLC v. 55 & ALLENDOWN, LLCCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.