Legal Opinion

Cranfield v. Industrial Commission

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided January 23, 1980No. 52056PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Underwood

Claimant, Thomas Cranfield, appeals from an order of the circuit court of Cook County confirming the Industrial Commission’s decision denying the reinstatement of his case, which had been dismissed by the arbitrator for want of prosecution.

On March 24, 1976, claimant filed an application for adjustment of claim with the Industrial Commission for alleged injuries sustained while employed by Uniroyal Company. After having been assigned to an arbitrator, the case was set for hearing on five different dates. On the final date, September 15, 1977, claimant failed to appear and his counsel stated…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. South Chicago Community Hospital v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Sweitzer v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1946
  3. City of Chicago v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Dyer v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Zimmerman v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1972

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bromberg v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Conley v. Industrial CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992
  3. Notman v. Industrial CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991
  4. Banks v. Industrial CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 2004
  5. Roberts v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API