Legal Opinion

City of Chicago v. Industrial Commission

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided March 29, 1976No. 47061PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Underwood

Claimant William Warmouth was injured on January 12, 1970, in the course of his employment by the City of Chicago. During the arbitrator’s hearing upon his claim for compensation under the Workmen’s Compensation Act

(Ill. Rev. Stat. 1969, ch. 48, par. 138.1 et seq.), claimant was cross-examined regarding earlier injuries, and testified regarding a prior injury to his left knee in 1967 for which he had received compensation in an undisclosed amount from the City. No suggestion was made in that hearing that the City was entitled to any credit for the prior compensation in the event an award was…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Sweitzer v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Trigg v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Board of Education v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Board of Education v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Dyer v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1936

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Board of Education of City of Chicago v. Industrial Com.Illinois Supreme Court · 1982
  2. McKay Plating Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Brinkmann v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Avon Products, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Mid-American Lines, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1980

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API