Legal Opinion

Conley v. Industrial Commission

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided May 28, 1992No. 4-91-0510WCPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRESIDING JUSTICE McCULLOUGH

delivered the opinion of the court:

Claimant’s application for adjustment of claim was dismissed for want of prosecution. More than 60 days later, claimant filed a motion to reinstate the case, which the arbitrator and Industrial Commission (Commission) denied. The circuit court confirmed the Commission and claimant appeals, contending he is entitled to reinstatement because there is no evidence he received notice that his case had been dismissed. We affirm.

Claimant, represented by attorney Warren Danz, filed an application for adjustment of claim, No. WC40371, on…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Cooke v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Zimmerman v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Forrest v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Cranfield v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Berry v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1978

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Compass Group v. Illinois Workers' Compensation Comm'nAppellate Court of Illinois · 2015
  2. Banks v. Industrial CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 2004
  3. TTC Illinois, Inc. v. Illinois Workers' Compensation CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API