Legal Opinion

Monroe Body Co. v. Herzog

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided July 10, 1926No. 4425PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DENISON, Circuit Judge.

After the mandate went down upon the second former appeal in this ease (Monroe Co. v. Herzog [C. C. A.] 2 F.[2d] 837), plaintiff began a proceeding in contempt against defendant. It was entitled in the equity case, alleged that the defendant had deliberately and willfully violated the injunction by making more infringing machines than the interlocutory order permitted, and had further violated the injunction by making and selling machines not reported, and by making others of modified forms which still continued to be within the injunction. The petition asked that he be…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Gompers v. Bucks Stove & Range Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  2. Proudfit Loose Leaf Co. v. Kalamazoo Loose Leaf Binder Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1915

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Hartford-Empire Co. v. OBEARNESTER GLASS CO.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1938
  2. Freeman v. AltvaterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1933
  3. United States Rubber Co. v. General Tire & Rubber Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1942
  4. Bake-Rite Mfg. Co. v. TomlinsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1926
  5. Sure Plus Manufacturing Co. v. Hy Kobrin and Kobrin Manufacturing, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API