Legal Opinion
United States Rubber Co. v. General Tire & Rubber Co.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided May 7, 1942No. 8899PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MARTIN, Circuit Judge.
This opinion should be read as supplementary to General Tire & Rubber Company v. Fisk Rubber Corporation, 6 Cir., 104 F.2d 740, where claims 1 to 10, inclusive, and claim 14 of Midgley Patent No. 1,742,777 were held valid and infringed.
Some four -months after entry in the district court of an interlocutory decree and injunction pursuant to the mandate of this court, the United States Rubber Company, as successor in right, title and interest to the entire patent rights, assets, business and goodwill of the Fisk Rubber Corporation and as substituted plaintiff, moved for a…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- MacHine Co. v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Sanitary Refrigerator Co. v. WintersSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Cimiotti Unhairing Co. v. American Fur Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Dunbar v. MyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- IVES v. HamiltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Sealed Air Corp. v. U.S. International Trade CommissionCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1981
- Fmc Corporation v. The F. E. Myers & Bro. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1967
- Coats Loaders & Stackers, Inc. v. HendersonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1956
- Darsyn Laboratories, Inc. v. Lenox Laboratories, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1954
- E-I-M Company, Inc. v. Philadelphia Gear Works, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.