Legal Opinion
Conoco Inc. v. Boh Bros. Construction Co.
District Court, W.D. Louisiana
Decided July 10, 1998No. 97-1378PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM RULING
TRIMBLE, District Judge.
Presently before the court is an appeal [Doc. 86] of the Magistrate Judge’s Ruling dated May 19, 1998, in which he granted in part and denied in part a Motion for a Protective Order by the plaintiff, Conoco. An Opposition Brief was filed by Boh [Doc. 101], as was a Reply Memorandum by Conoco.
Conoco has brought this action against Boh Brothers and National Union seeking contractual indemnification from Boh and defense costs and insurance coverage from National Union. In order to challenge the reasonableness of Conoco’s settlement with Cauthron and…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- United States v. NoblesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Swidler & Berlin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Sporck v. PeilCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- United States of America and Revenue Agents Clarence H. Isabel and John S. Reid of the Internal Revenue Service v. The El Paso CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. BradyDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2006
- Chevron Oronite Company, LLC v. Jacobs Field SvcsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2020
- Cacamo v. Liberty Mut. Fire Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2001
- Estate of Manship v. United StatesDistrict Court, M.D. Louisiana · 2006
- Barback v. FisherDistrict Court, M.D. Louisiana · 2022
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.